Call For A Free Consultation(602) 345-1818
Call For A Free Consultation(602) 345-1818
Your medical bills are a number on a page. The reason you can’t sleep, can’t pick up your kids the way you used to, and dread the drive to work is not. That second category is what Arizona law calls non-economic damages, and in a Phoenix personal injury case it is often the larger part of what a claim is actually worth. It is also the part insurance adjusters work hardest to shrink.
This article explains what non-economic damages are under Arizona law, how they get calculated, how comparative fault reduces them, and how to prove them when the adjuster starts pushing back. If you want a broader look at our personal injury practice, start there. If you’re already dealing with an adjuster who is putting a number on your pain, keep reading.
Non-economic damages are the subjective losses caused by an injury: physical pain, mental anguish, emotional distress, loss of enjoyment of life, disfigurement, and loss of consortium. They compensate you for what the injury did to your life, not just to your bank account.
Compare that to economic damages, which are the quantifiable financial losses: medical bills, lost wages, future medical costs, property damage. Economic damages come with receipts. Non-economic damages come with your daily experience.
Both categories are real. Arizona jury instructions treat them as separate line items on a verdict form, and a jury can award both.
Arizona’s Revised Jury Instructions (Civil) for personal injury damages recognize non-economic losses in six overlapping categories. Each one is proven differently.
Physical pain. The actual physical suffering caused by the injury, from the moment of impact through recovery and, in some cases, for the rest of your life. Proven with medical records, pain scale entries, and treating physician testimony.
Mental anguish. Anxiety, fear, sleep disruption, and psychological distress tied to the injury. Proven with therapy notes, psychiatric evaluations, and testimony about behavioral changes.
Emotional distress. Related to but broader than mental anguish. Covers grief, humiliation, and the emotional weight of losing physical function. Family witness testimony is powerful here.
Loss of enjoyment of life. The things you used to do and can’t do now, or can’t do the same way. Hiking Camelback, playing pickleball, coaching your kid’s team, sleeping through the night. Proven with before-and-after testimony from people who knew you well.
Disfigurement. Visible scarring, amputation, or permanent physical changes. Photographs and treating surgeon testimony carry this category.
Loss of consortium. A separate claim your spouse can bring for the loss of companionship, affection, and services your injuries caused. Arizona case law (City of Glendale v. Bradshaw and its line) recognizes loss of consortium as a distinct claim, meaning your spouse’s damages are their own, not just an add-on to yours.
No. And this is a bigger deal than most competitor pages admit.
Two provisions of the Arizona Constitution protect the full value of your non-economic damages. Article II § 31 prohibits laws that would limit the amount of damages recoverable for causing death or personal injury. Article XVIII § 6 protects the right to recover damages for injuries from statutory limitation.
The practical result: unlike Texas, California, or a long list of other states that cap pain and suffering by statute, Arizona juries can award what the evidence supports. There is no arbitrary ceiling on what a permanent injury is worth. A catastrophic injury case in Phoenix is not artificially trimmed to fit inside a legislative box.
This matters when the other side’s adjuster tries to anchor low. They may reference “typical” numbers from other jurisdictions. Those numbers are not the law here.
There is no binding formula. Arizona juries have discretion, and adjusters use informal methods in the settlement phase. Three approaches show up most often.
The multiplier method. Total the economic damages, then multiply by a number between roughly 1.5x and 5x based on injury severity, treatment length, and permanency. A soft-tissue neck strain that resolves in three months sits at the low end. A traumatic brain injury with permanent cognitive limitations sits at the high end. The multiplier is a rough negotiating tool, not a rule.
The per-diem method. Assign a daily dollar value to the pain and multiply by the number of days you’ll experience it. Works better for injuries with a defined recovery arc than for permanent conditions.
Jury discretion. At trial, jurors are instructed to award “a fair and reasonable amount” for each category. They hear the evidence and decide. No calculator.
For a deeper walkthrough of the arithmetic side (including the multiplier method with worked examples), see how damages are calculated in Phoenix. The short version: non-economic damages track the strength of the underlying medical proof and the visibility of the life impact. Weak documentation shrinks them. Strong documentation lets them stand on their own.
Arizona is a pure comparative negligence state under A.R.S. § 12-2505. If a jury finds you 20% at fault for the accident, your recovery gets reduced by 20%, including your non-economic damages.
The math: total damages × (100% minus plaintiff’s fault percentage) = recovery.
Example. A jury awards $200,000 total: $50,000 economic and $150,000 non-economic. The jury also finds you 30% at fault. Your recovery is $140,000 total, with the non-economic portion cut proportionally to $105,000. The reduction hits both categories the same way.
This is one reason the fault fight matters as much as the injury fight. Every percentage point of fault the defense attaches to you comes out of pain and suffering too, not just medical bills. Arizona’s comparative negligence rule is worth understanding in full before you agree to any statement of what happened.
Non-economic damages are subjective, but “subjective” does not mean “unprovable.” The evidence types that carry them:
Medical records. Pain complaints logged at each visit. Prescription history for pain medication. Referrals to specialists for chronic pain, sleep issues, or mental health treatment.
Treating physician testimony. Your doctors explain what your injury does, why it causes ongoing suffering, and what limits it will impose long term. Under the Arizona Rules of Evidence, treating physicians can testify to their observations and, with proper foundation, to prognosis.
Expert medical testimony for future suffering. Future medical costs and the non-economic damages tied to future pain typically require expert testimony projecting ongoing treatment needs, limitations, and prognosis. A jury cannot award for future suffering the record does not support.
Therapy and counseling records. If the accident caused anxiety, PTSD, depression, or sleep disorders, mental health treatment records document it in a way self-report alone cannot.
A pain journal. Contemporaneous notes about pain levels, missed activities, sleep quality, and mood. Not required, but powerful. Juries respond to specifics.
Before-and-after witness testimony. Family, coworkers, and close friends describe who you were before the crash and who you are now. This is where loss of enjoyment of life becomes concrete instead of abstract.
Photographs. Of injuries during healing, of scarring, of medical equipment in your home, of the activities you used to do.
The pattern: the more your file looks like a documented life impact and the less it looks like a bare complaint, the harder it is for the other side to discount.
Adjusters have a playbook for shrinking the subjective portion of a claim. Recognizing it helps.
Treatment gaps. If you waited three weeks to see a doctor, or missed physical therapy appointments, the adjuster argues your pain must not have been that bad. Consistent treatment protects the claim.
Prior conditions. If you had a preexisting neck complaint, the adjuster argues the current pain is old, not accident-related. Arizona law allows recovery for aggravation of preexisting conditions, but you have to prove the aggravation.
Subjective symptom challenges. “There’s no objective imaging finding, so the pain can’t be quantified.” This works less well when treating physicians document consistent clinical findings and functional limits.
Social media. A photo of you smiling at a birthday party becomes “claimant appeared to be enjoying full quality of life.” Assume everything you post is exhibit material.
Anchoring low. The first offer often values pain and suffering at a small multiple of the medical bills, or ignores it entirely. That number is a starting point in a negotiation, not an assessment of what the claim is worth at trial.
Adjusters are doing their job. Yours is to make sure your file leaves them no clean places to cut.
These get confused constantly, including in some competitor articles. They are not the same.
Non-economic damages compensate you for what you suffered. They are compensatory.
Punitive damages punish the defendant for particularly bad conduct and are separate from anything you personally lost. Under Arizona law (Linthicum v. Nationwide Life Ins. Co.), punitive damages require proof of an “evil mind,” meaning the defendant acted with conscious disregard for the rights of others. They show up in DUI cases, road rage cases, intentional misconduct, and some gross negligence situations, but they are not automatic and they are not part of standard negligence recovery.
A jury can award both in the same case, but they are separate categories on a verdict form. If you want the deeper explainer, punitive damages in Arizona covers the standard and the situations where they apply.
Two years. Under A.R.S. § 12-542, you have two years from the date of injury to file a personal injury lawsuit claiming non-economic damages. Miss it and the claim is gone, regardless of how strong the evidence is.
Two exceptions worth knowing:
Do not rely on exceptions. Assume the two-year clock started running the day of the accident and work backward from that.
There is no typical number. Value depends on injury severity, treatment history, permanency, fault proof, available insurance, and how well the life impact is documented. A minor injury that fully resolves is worth a fraction of what a permanent injury with lasting limitations is worth. Anyone quoting you a range without seeing your records is guessing.
For present pain tied to a documented injury, medical records and treating physician testimony usually carry it. For future pain and long-term limitations, expert medical testimony projecting the prognosis is generally required. The bigger the future component, the more expert support the claim needs.
Yes. Arizona recognizes loss of consortium as a separate claim your spouse can bring for the loss of companionship, affection, and services caused by your injuries. It has its own damages and its own valuation.
Yes. Under A.R.S. § 12-2505, your total recovery (economic and non-economic) is reduced by your percentage of fault. Even 100% of the pain and suffering award gets cut proportionally.
No. Arizona Constitution Article II § 31 prohibits laws limiting damages for death or personal injury, and Article XVIII § 6 protects injury-damages actions from statutory limitation. There is no ceiling on non-economic damages in Arizona.
Two years from the date of injury under A.R.S. § 12-542 for most personal injury claims. Government defendants trigger a much shorter 180-day notice requirement under A.R.S. § 12-821.01.
The insurance company will assign a value to your suffering whether you participate in that valuation or not. The question is whether your file, when they look at it, gives them reasons to value it low or reasons to value it fairly.
Free case review with Jared J. Pehrson. We answer 24/7. No attorney’s fees unless we recover, subject to the terms of the written fee agreement. (602) 345-1818.
By Jared J. Pehrson | Impact Legal Car Accident Attorneys
We're Here To Help 24/7
(602) 345-1818