Call For A Free Consultation(602) 345-1818
If you’ve been hit on your motorcycle in Phoenix, you already know this isn’t a regular car crash. The injuries are worse. The insurance fight is harder. And the adjuster on the other end of the line is already building a story where the rider is at fault, because that’s the story juries tend to believe. This page walks through how Arizona law actually treats motorcycle crashes, where the insurance traps are, and what a Phoenix motorcycle accident attorney should be doing on a claim like this.
Jared J. Pehrson handles our motorcycle accident cases personally. No hand-off to an associate. Call (602) 345-1818 for a free case review.
The first 72 hours matter more than the next 72 days. Here’s the order of operations:
That last one matters more than people realize. The bike is evidence. Damage patterns, scrape locations, and gouge marks tell an accident reconstructionist exactly what happened. Once the bike is gone, that evidence is gone.
Two Arizona rules trip up motorcyclists more than any others: the helmet law and the lane filtering law.
Arizona only requires helmets for riders under 18. Adult riders can legally ride without a helmet. That seems straightforward until it gets to court.
Here’s what insurance adjusters do: they argue that not wearing a helmet contributed to head injuries, so recovery should be reduced. Arizona courts have generally limited the pure “helmet defense” as a bar to recovery, but defense attorneys still raise it to muddy the waters with jurors. We push back hard on this, especially in head-injury and traumatic brain injury claims where the bias can swing damages significantly.
Arizona passed a lane filtering law that took effect in 2022. The statute permits motorcyclists to filter (move forward between lanes of stopped traffic) under specific conditions:
These are the conditions as generally summarized; the precise statutory text and any subsequent amendments should be confirmed against the current Arizona Revised Statutes before relying on the law for any specific situation.
Full lane splitting (riding between moving cars at speed) remains illegal in Arizona. The difference matters. If a rider was filtering legally when a driver opened a door or changed lanes into them, they were not breaking the law, and that needs to be in the claim file from day one. If the police report misstates the legal standard (and we see this regularly), it needs to be corrected before the carrier locks in a fault determination. For more detail on how filtering applies to claims, see our breakdown of Arizona’s lane filtering rules.
Most Phoenix motorcycle crashes fall into one of four patterns:
A driver turning left across oncoming traffic fails to see (or misjudges) the motorcycle and turns directly into the rider’s path. Arizona’s right-of-way rule (A.R.S. § 28-772) generally requires the driver making the left turn to yield to oncoming traffic. These are usually clean liability cases, but the defense often argues the motorcyclist was speeding to shift fault. Reconstruction evidence (skid marks, debris field, ECM data from the car) usually settles that argument. We cover the specifics of left-turn crashes in more depth elsewhere on the site.
The driver checks the mirror, doesn’t see the bike in the blind spot, and merges. “I didn’t see him” is not a defense under Arizona law. Failure to maintain a lane and failure to yield are both statutory violations that establish negligence.
Distracted drivers, especially on Loop 101 and I-10, rear-end motorcycles stopped at lights. The follow-on driver is almost always at fault, but the question becomes damages, because rear-ending a bike at 25 mph can produce catastrophic injuries.
A drunk driver hitting a motorcyclist is one of the few situations where punitive damages come into play. Arizona allows punitive damages when the defendant acted with an “evil mind,” a standard the Arizona Supreme Court articulated in Linthicum v. Nationwide Life Ins. Co., 150 Ariz. 326, 723 P.2d 675 (1986). DUI crashes regularly meet that bar. More on how this works on our punitive damages in Arizona page.
Arizona is a pure comparative negligence state under A.R.S. § 12-2505. A rider can recover damages even at 99% fault. Recovery just gets reduced by the rider’s share of fault.
In theory, that’s friendly to motorcyclists. In practice, it’s where the insurance fight lives. Adjusters know that every percentage point of fault they pin on the rider directly reduces what they have to pay. So they push fault hard. The pattern looks like this:
We counter with accident reconstruction, scene photos, ECM data, helmet-camera footage when available, and witness statements collected fast. Read more about how Arizona’s pure comparative negligence rule shapes settlement negotiations.
Every claim is different, and any website quoting a number without seeing the file is guessing. That said, here’s the framework:
Economic damages (the receipts):
– Emergency room and hospital bills
– Surgery, follow-up care, physical therapy
– Future medical care (often the biggest number, especially with TBI or spinal injuries)
– Lost wages and lost earning capacity
– Property damage to the bike and gear
Non-economic damages (the human cost):
– Pain and suffering
– Loss of enjoyment of life
– Disfigurement and scarring
– Emotional distress
Arizona is one of the better states for injured plaintiffs on this front. There is no cap on non-economic damages under Article 2, § 31 of the Arizona Constitution. That matters enormously for serious motorcycle injuries, because the pain-and-suffering component of a major crash often is a significant share of the total claim. Our non-economic damages page explains how this is calculated. For a structured walkthrough of valuation, see what a case is actually worth.
Punitive damages are available in DUI crashes and other “evil mind” situations under the standard set in Linthicum.
Arizona’s minimum auto liability limits are 25/50/15: $25,000 per person for bodily injury, $50,000 per accident, and $15,000 for property damage. Those limits were raised from the previous 15/30/10 floor effective July 1, 2020. That 25/50/15 is the floor most drivers carry.
Here’s the problem: $25,000 doesn’t cover a single helicopter ride to Banner University Medical Center. It doesn’t cover one surgery. A serious motorcycle crash routinely produces medical bills well into six figures, and that’s before lost wages or future care.
When the at-fault driver only has minimum coverage, the only way to make a motorcyclist whole is uninsured/underinsured motorist coverage on the rider’s own policy. Under A.R.S. § 20-259.01, Arizona insurers must offer UM/UIM coverage, and the insured has to reject it in writing to opt out. Most riders don’t realize they have it, or how much. Step one on every motorcycle claim we open: pull every policy in the household and check the UM/UIM stacking. For background on how this coverage operates, see our breakdown of UM/UIM coverage in Arizona.
When UM/UIM is in place, the rider can pursue their own insurer for the gap between what the at-fault driver’s policy paid and what the actual damages are. This is often where the real money in a motorcycle claim lives.
Maricopa County and ADOT crash data consistently show elevated motorcycle crash rates at:
NHTSA’s published traffic safety data has, in recent reporting years, shown motorcyclists to be roughly 20 to 28 times more likely than passenger car occupants to die in a crash per vehicle mile traveled, with the exact multiplier varying by reporting year. The point isn’t the precise number. The point is that the order of magnitude is much higher for riders than for anyone in a car. That’s the backdrop for every one of these corridors. We serve riders across the Phoenix metro service areas and surrounding communities.
Knowing the location matters. It tells us which agency responded (Phoenix PD vs. DPS vs. local jurisdiction), which signals exist, and what surveillance footage might be available. Traffic camera footage on ADOT routes has a limited retention window, sometimes as short as 72 hours, so we send preservation letters fast.
This is the part most law firm websites won’t say out loud. Juries and adjusters carry a built-in bias that motorcyclists are reckless. They see the bike, they assume the rider was speeding, splitting lanes, showing off. That bias is in the file before the first witness is interviewed.
We work the bias problem directly:
You don’t beat bias by ignoring it. You beat it by getting in front of it.
Under A.R.S. § 12-542, a rider has two years from the date of the crash to file a personal injury lawsuit in Arizona. Miss the deadline and the claim is gone, regardless of how strong the facts are. Wrongful death claims carry the same two-year window. More on the two-year statute of limitations and how it applies.
Claims against a government entity (a city vehicle, a state employee, a public bus, a county road defect) have two extra deadlines that catch people off guard:
So a rider hit by a city vehicle has a 180-day notice deadline and a one-year suit deadline, not the two-year deadline that applies to private drivers. Don’t assume the standard window applies when government is in the mix.
Don’t wait until month 23 on any motorcycle claim. By then, witnesses have moved, footage is gone, and the claim is harder to build.
We’re a boutique firm. That’s not marketing language; it’s the structure. Jared handles the work personally. When a rider calls, they talk to him, not an intake screener three layers deep. When suit is filed, his name is on the pleading. When we sit across from the adjuster, he’s the one in the room.
Practically, that means on a motorcycle claim:
If a phone call is easier than reading more: (602) 345-1818. Free case review. Fee and cost terms are spelled out in the written engagement agreement.
Yes. Arizona only requires helmets for riders under 18. Riding without a helmet as an adult is legal and does not bar recovery. The defense may argue head injuries were worse because of it, but that’s a damages argument, not a liability bar. We address it head-on with medical and biomechanical evidence.
Police reports are evidence, not gospel. Officers reach the scene after the crash, often without trained reconstruction expertise. We’ve worked claims where the report blamed the rider and reconstruction evidence flipped fault entirely. The report is a starting point, not the ending.
That’s where the rider’s own UM/UIM coverage matters. Under A.R.S. § 20-259.01, the insurer was required to offer it, and unless it was rejected in writing, the rider likely has it. We pull every household policy on every motorcycle claim for exactly this reason. The 25/50/15 state minimum rarely covers a serious motorcycle injury.
It depends on injury severity and whether liability is contested. Straightforward claims with clear fault and completed medical treatment can resolve in roughly 6 to 12 months. Claims involving surgery, future care, or contested liability often take 18 to 36 months, especially if litigation is required. We don’t push for fast settlements that shortchange the medical picture.
Yes. Arizona is a pure comparative negligence state. Even at 70% fault, a rider can still recover 30% of their damages. That said, adjusters use comparative fault aggressively to cut motorcyclist recoveries, so the fault percentage is often the central fight in the claim.
We work on contingency. Specific fee percentages, case costs, and any cost-recovery terms are spelled out in the written engagement agreement. The free case review is exactly that: free, with no obligation.
If a rider has been hit on a motorcycle in Phoenix, the best move is to talk to us before talking to the other driver’s insurance. We’ll explain what we see, what the realistic range looks like, and whether an attorney is actually needed. Sometimes the answer is no. When the answer is yes, the reasons will be clear.
Call (602) 345-1818. We answer 24/7. Free case review.
By Jared J. Pehrson | Impact Legal Car Accident Attorneys
We're Here To Help 24/7
(602) 345-1818