Fault and responsibility
Who caused an event, which injuries it caused, and what those losses amount to are related questions. They are not always resolved at the same time. These stories show where those questions can get confused.
Choose an episodeWatch the situations unfold
Start with the question that is still disputed
One Percent explores a proposed share of fault. Accepted Fault looks at why an insurer can accept responsibility for a collision while disputing the losses. The Wet Floor Sign examines a warning, notice of a hazard, and the surrounding precautions.
For each situation, separate what someone says happened from the evidence supporting it. The useful next question may concern a camera view, the placement of a warning, a medical record, or the reason for a proposed percentage. That is more specific than arguing over the general label “at fault.”
Keep the legal rule attached to its facts
Arizona’s comparative-negligence and fault-allocation statutes have qualifications. A worked percentage is an illustration of one calculation, not a prediction of coverage or recovery. Premises claims also require attention to the condition, notice, and reasonable care under the circumstances.
The explanations below identify those distinctions and link to the underlying sources. Use the longer guides for a broader discussion of proof and compensation, and the short episodes to see the question play out in a scene.
Explore a question
Watch a scene, explore the real-world issue, and find the related Impact Legal guide.
Insurance decisions after a crash
Explore settlement checks, release terms, and medical-records authorizations through three T-Shirt Lawyer episodes and related Arizona guides.
4 episodes with explanationsThe evidence behind a crash claim
Explore alcohol-service evidence, truck visibility, and driver qualification records through T-Shirt Lawyer episodes and practical legal explanations.


